Deep dive
Every row of the export, one hand at a time
The other pages add hands up. This one does not: each row below is a line of the export exactly as it was written, with what the seat staked, what came back, and how that compares to the stake.
24 of 42,205 rowsJul 17
Hands in view
24
24 rounds · 5 seats
Staked
$3.3k
$139 average bet
Player result
+$2,510
positive means the seats finished up
Biggest bet
$210
across 12 distinct amounts
Win / loss / push
24 / 0 / 0
100.0% of hands won
Hands
24 rows
| Time | Seat | Player | Bet | Win/Loss | Result | Return | Total table action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 17 19:38:34 | 7 | Player 7 | $125 | WIN | +$100 | +0.80×Under evens | $17074% of the felt |
| Jul 17 06:57:25 | 5 | James Miller | $175 | WIN | +$25 | +0.14×Under evens | $24571% of the felt |
| Jul 17 06:52:34 | 5 | James Miller | $125 | WIN | +$525 | +4.20×Over evens | $18069% of the felt |
| Jul 17 06:42:56 | 5 | James Miller | $125 | WIN | +$25 | +0.20×Under evens | $20561% of the felt |
| Jul 17 06:16:32 | 3 | Player 3 | $105 | WIN | +$30 | +0.29×Under evens | $17062% of the felt |
| Jul 17 06:10:03 | 3 | Player 3 | $125 | WIN | +$40 | +0.32×Under evens | $20063% of the felt |
| Jul 17 06:09:27 | 3 | Player 3 | $125 | WIN | +$40 | +0.32×Under evens | $19564% of the felt |
| Jul 17 05:52:57 | 3 | Player 3 | $145 | WIN | +$55 | +0.38×Under evens | $30048% of the felt |
| Jul 17 05:24:31 | 6 | Player 6 | $120 | WIN | +$60 | +0.50×Under evens | $89513% of the felt |
| Jul 17 04:11:20 | 3 | Player 3 | $175 | WIN | +$125 | +0.71×Under evens | $22578% of the felt |
| Jul 17 04:06:46 | 3 | Player 3 | $170 | WIN | +$130 | +0.76×Under evens | $20583% of the felt |
| Jul 17 04:05:42 | 3 | Player 3 | $115 | WIN | +$85 | +0.74×Under evens | $12096% of the felt |
| Jul 17 04:01:50 | 3 | Player 3 | $210 | WIN | +$185 | +0.88×Under evens | $210100% of the felt |
| Jul 17 03:59:19 | 3 | Player 3 | $145 | WIN | +$105 | +0.72×Under evens | $23562% of the felt |
| Jul 17 03:41:03 | 8 | Player 8 | $175 | WIN | +$85 | +0.49×Under evens | $22578% of the felt |
| Jul 17 03:36:59 | 8 | Player 8 | $115 | WIN | +$85 | +0.74×Under evens | $115100% of the felt |
| Jul 17 03:36:32 | 8 | Player 8 | $110 | WIN | +$90 | +0.82×Under evens | $110100% of the felt |
| Jul 17 03:34:47 | 8 | Player 8 | $150 | WIN | +$125 | +0.83×Under evens | $16094% of the felt |
| Jul 17 03:33:59 | 8 | Player 8 | $165 | WIN | +$150 | +0.91×Under evens | $165100% of the felt |
| Jul 17 03:31:32 | 8 | Player 8 | $105 | WIN | +$95 | +0.90×Under evens | $15568% of the felt |
| Jul 17 02:53:41 | 5 | James Miller | $150 | WIN | +$125 | +0.83×Under evens | $29052% of the felt |
| Jul 17 02:27:24 | 8 | Player 8 | $125 | WIN | +$40 | +0.32×Under evens | $17571% of the felt |
| Jul 17 01:51:33 | 3 | Player 3 | $125 | WIN | +$95 | +0.76×Under evens | $17074% of the felt |
| Jul 17 01:49:21 | 3 | Player 3 | $130 | WIN | +$90 | +0.69×Under evens | $17574% of the felt |
What the bets actually were
12 distinct amounts in view — pick one to see only those hands
| Bet | Hands | Share of hands | Staked | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $125 | 77W 0L 0P | 29.2% | $875 | +$865 |
| $175 | 33W 0L 0P | 12.5% | $525 | +$235 |
| $105 | 22W 0L 0P | 8.3% | $210 | +$125 |
| $115 | 22W 0L 0P | 8.3% | $230 | +$170 |
| $145 | 22W 0L 0P | 8.3% | $290 | +$160 |
| $150 | 22W 0L 0P | 8.3% | $300 | +$250 |
| $110 | 11W 0L 0P | 4.2% | $110 | +$90 |
| $120 | 11W 0L 0P | 4.2% | $120 | +$60 |
| $130 | 11W 0L 0P | 4.2% | $130 | +$90 |
| $165 | 11W 0L 0P | 4.2% | $165 | +$150 |
| $170 | 11W 0L 0P | 4.2% | $170 | +$130 |
| $210 | 11W 0L 0P | 4.2% | $210 | +$185 |
How the money came back
Result against the stake. Neither the outcome column nor any total says which of these happened.
| Return | Hands | Share | Staked | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stake lostthe whole bet went | 0 | 0.0% | $0 | $0 |
| Part lostless than the bet came off | 0 | 0.0% | $0 | $0 |
| Pushthe bet came back untouched | 0 | 0.0% | $0 | $0 |
| Under evenswon less than the bet | 23 | 95.8% | $3.2k | +$1,985 |
| Even moneywon exactly the bet | 0 | 0.0% | $0 | $0 |
| Over evenswon more than the bet | 1 | 4.2% | $125 | +$525 |
The seven columns
What the export holds, counted over all of it rather than over the slice above.
| Column | What it holds | Distinct values | Range |
|---|---|---|---|
| Time | The deal this hand belongs to. Rows sharing a round_id are one round; the clock has no timezone. | 17,751 rounds | Jul 6 06:58:54 → Jul 31 23:55:16 |
| Player | Who was in the seat. The export names nobody — a profile can be linked to a seat on the players page. | 7 players | Player 1, Player 2, Player 3, Player 5, Player 6, Player 7, Player 8 |
| Seat | Where they sat. In this export the seat number and the player number are always the same. | 7 seats | seats 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8 |
| Bet | What went out before the hand was played. Summed across a round it equals total table action exactly. | 260 amounts | $1 → $3,075 · $52 average |
| Win/Loss | The label on the hand. It never disagrees with the sign of the result, so it adds nothing the money does not. | 3 values | 12,555 WIN · 22,322 LOSS · 7,328 PUSH |
| Result | The seat's own position on the hand, signed: negative is the player down, positive up, zero a push. Not the room's collection — that fee has no column in this export. | 429 amounts | −$2,800 → $16,400 |
| Total Table Action | The whole table's stake for that deal, repeated on every hand of the round. | 528 amounts | $1 → $5,370 · $172 average |
42,205 rows in the export, nothing dropped and nothing added. Every other page on this dashboard is one of these tables summed.