Deep dive
Every row of the export, one hand at a time
The other pages add hands up. This one does not: each row below is a line of the export exactly as it was written, with what the seat staked, what came back, and how that compares to the stake.
22 of 42,205 rowsJul 27
Hands in view
22
18 rounds · 6 seats
Staked
$3.7k
$168 average bet
Player result
−$3,505
positive means the seats finished up
Biggest bet
$250
across 11 distinct amounts
Win / loss / push
0 / 22 / 0
0.0% of hands won
Hands
22 rows
| Time | Seat | Player | Bet | Win/Loss | Result | Return | Total table action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 27 23:57:53 | 8 | Player 8 | $105 | LOSS | −$105 | −1.00×Stake lost | $19554% of the felt |
| Jul 27 23:57:01 | 5 | James Miller | $200 | LOSS | −$200 | −1.00×Stake lost | $48541% of the felt |
| Jul 27 23:57:01 | 7 | Player 7 | $135 | LOSS | −$135 | −1.00×Stake lost | $48528% of the felt |
| Jul 27 23:57:01 | 8 | Player 8 | $125 | LOSS | −$125 | −1.00×Stake lost | $48526% of the felt |
| Jul 27 23:54:54 | 8 | Player 8 | $150 | LOSS | −$150 | −1.00×Stake lost | $19079% of the felt |
| Jul 27 23:49:07 | 5 | James Miller | $250 | LOSS | −$250 | −1.00×Stake lost | $41361% of the felt |
| Jul 27 23:48:32 | 5 | James Miller | $150 | LOSS | −$150 | −1.00×Stake lost | $17088% of the felt |
| Jul 27 23:44:30 | 5 | James Miller | $250 | LOSS | −$200 | −0.80×Part lost | $50050% of the felt |
| Jul 27 23:44:30 | 7 | Player 7 | $130 | LOSS | −$130 | −1.00×Stake lost | $50026% of the felt |
| Jul 27 04:16:43 | 5 | James Miller | $105 | LOSS | −$35 | −0.33×Part lost | $17062% of the felt |
| Jul 27 03:10:16 | 6 | Player 6 | $105 | LOSS | −$105 | −1.00×Stake lost | $38028% of the felt |
| Jul 27 02:53:01 | 3 | Player 3 | $225 | LOSS | −$225 | −1.00×Stake lost | $43052% of the felt |
| Jul 27 02:53:01 | 5 | James Miller | $105 | LOSS | −$105 | −1.00×Stake lost | $43024% of the felt |
| Jul 27 01:23:22 | 3 | Player 3 | $125 | LOSS | −$125 | −1.00×Stake lost | $1,12511% of the felt |
| Jul 27 00:51:59 | 5 | James Miller | $200 | LOSS | −$200 | −1.00×Stake lost | $2,5008% of the felt |
| Jul 27 00:39:38 | 6 | Player 6 | $105 | LOSS | −$95 | −0.90×Part lost | $40026% of the felt |
| Jul 27 00:33:39 | 3 | Player 3 | $225 | LOSS | −$225 | −1.00×Stake lost | $24592% of the felt |
| Jul 27 00:19:54 | 6 | Player 6 | $205 | LOSS | −$195 | −0.95×Part lost | $23089% of the felt |
| Jul 27 00:17:16 | 5 | James Miller | $215 | LOSS | −$185 | −0.86×Part lost | $23591% of the felt |
| Jul 27 00:15:58 | 6 | Player 6 | $110 | LOSS | −$90 | −0.82×Part lost | $13085% of the felt |
| Jul 27 00:13:36 | 3 | Player 3 | $250 | LOSS | −$250 | −1.00×Stake lost | $32078% of the felt |
| Jul 27 00:09:16 | 2 | Player 2 | $225 | LOSS | −$225 | −1.00×Stake lost | $37061% of the felt |
What the bets actually were
11 distinct amounts in view — pick one to see only those hands
| Bet | Hands | Share of hands | Staked | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $105 | 50W 5L 0P | 22.7% | $525 | −$445 |
| $225 | 30W 3L 0P | 13.6% | $675 | −$675 |
| $250 | 30W 3L 0P | 13.6% | $750 | −$700 |
| $125 | 20W 2L 0P | 9.1% | $250 | −$250 |
| $150 | 20W 2L 0P | 9.1% | $300 | −$300 |
| $200 | 20W 2L 0P | 9.1% | $400 | −$400 |
| $110 | 10W 1L 0P | 4.5% | $110 | −$90 |
| $130 | 10W 1L 0P | 4.5% | $130 | −$130 |
| $135 | 10W 1L 0P | 4.5% | $135 | −$135 |
| $205 | 10W 1L 0P | 4.5% | $205 | −$195 |
| $215 | 10W 1L 0P | 4.5% | $215 | −$185 |
How the money came back
Result against the stake. Neither the outcome column nor any total says which of these happened.
| Return | Hands | Share | Staked | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stake lostthe whole bet went | 16 | 72.7% | $2.7k | −$2,705 |
| Part lostless than the bet came off | 6 | 27.3% | $990 | −$800 |
| Pushthe bet came back untouched | 0 | 0.0% | $0 | $0 |
| Under evenswon less than the bet | 0 | 0.0% | $0 | $0 |
| Even moneywon exactly the bet | 0 | 0.0% | $0 | $0 |
| Over evenswon more than the bet | 0 | 0.0% | $0 | $0 |
The seven columns
What the export holds, counted over all of it rather than over the slice above.
| Column | What it holds | Distinct values | Range |
|---|---|---|---|
| Time | The deal this hand belongs to. Rows sharing a round_id are one round; the clock has no timezone. | 17,751 rounds | Jul 6 06:58:54 → Jul 31 23:55:16 |
| Player | Who was in the seat. The export names nobody — a profile can be linked to a seat on the players page. | 7 players | Player 1, Player 2, Player 3, Player 5, Player 6, Player 7, Player 8 |
| Seat | Where they sat. In this export the seat number and the player number are always the same. | 7 seats | seats 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8 |
| Bet | What went out before the hand was played. Summed across a round it equals total table action exactly. | 260 amounts | $1 → $3,075 · $52 average |
| Win/Loss | The label on the hand. It never disagrees with the sign of the result, so it adds nothing the money does not. | 3 values | 12,555 WIN · 22,322 LOSS · 7,328 PUSH |
| Result | The seat's own position on the hand, signed: negative is the player down, positive up, zero a push. Not the room's collection — that fee has no column in this export. | 429 amounts | −$2,800 → $16,400 |
| Total Table Action | The whole table's stake for that deal, repeated on every hand of the round. | 528 amounts | $1 → $5,370 · $172 average |
42,205 rows in the export, nothing dropped and nothing added. Every other page on this dashboard is one of these tables summed.