Deep dive
Every row of the export, one hand at a time
The other pages add hands up. This one does not: each row below is a line of the export exactly as it was written, with what the seat staked, what came back, and how that compares to the stake.
112 of 42,205 rows$80 bets
Hands in view
112
112 rounds · 5 seats
Staked
$9.0k
$80 average bet
Player result
+$4,745
positive means the seats finished up
Biggest bet
$80
across 1 distinct amount
Win / loss / push
112 / 0 / 0
100.0% of hands won
Hands
Page 2 of 2 · 60 rows a page
| Time | Seat | Player | Bet | Win/Loss | Result | Return | Total table action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 13 02:59:59 | 3 | Player 3 | $80 | WIN | +$30 | +0.38×Under evens | $1,1407% of the felt |
| Jul 13 02:35:25 | 3 | Player 3 | $80 | WIN | +$45 | +0.56×Under evens | $17047% of the felt |
| Jul 13 02:00:48 | 5 | James Miller | $80 | WIN | +$50 | +0.63×Under evens | $17147% of the felt |
| Jul 12 22:16:33 | 3 | Player 3 | $80 | WIN | +$30 | +0.38×Under evens | $12067% of the felt |
| Jul 12 22:09:05 | 3 | Player 3 | $80 | WIN | +$60 | +0.75×Under evens | $80100% of the felt |
| Jul 12 22:07:46 | 3 | Player 3 | $80 | WIN | +$30 | +0.38×Under evens | $10576% of the felt |
| Jul 12 19:04:43 | 8 | Player 8 | $80 | WIN | +$30 | +0.38×Under evens | $24033% of the felt |
| Jul 12 03:23:19 | 6 | Player 6 | $80 | WIN | +$30 | +0.38×Under evens | $12564% of the felt |
| Jul 11 21:30:30 | 5 | James Miller | $80 | WIN | +$50 | +0.63×Under evens | $8594% of the felt |
| Jul 11 21:29:42 | 5 | James Miller | $80 | WIN | +$20 | +0.25×Under evens | $9089% of the felt |
| Jul 11 21:04:25 | 5 | James Miller | $80 | WIN | +$45 | +0.56×Under evens | $13062% of the felt |
| Jul 11 20:59:06 | 5 | James Miller | $80 | WIN | +$10 | +0.13×Under evens | $9584% of the felt |
| Jul 11 07:24:04 | 5 | James Miller | $80 | WIN | +$10 | +0.13×Under evens | $50516% of the felt |
| Jul 11 02:21:29 | 5 | James Miller | $80 | WIN | +$20 | +0.25×Under evens | $9584% of the felt |
| Jul 11 00:34:32 | 5 | James Miller | $80 | WIN | +$65 | +0.81×Under evens | $21537% of the felt |
| Jul 11 00:09:01 | 6 | Player 6 | $80 | WIN | +$50 | +0.63×Under evens | $24533% of the felt |
| Jul 10 23:32:18 | 8 | Player 8 | $80 | WIN | +$50 | +0.63×Under evens | $24533% of the felt |
| Jul 10 23:27:38 | 8 | Player 8 | $80 | WIN | +$50 | +0.63×Under evens | $24533% of the felt |
| Jul 10 23:20:01 | 6 | Player 6 | $80 | WIN | +$55 | +0.69×Under evens | $37022% of the felt |
| Jul 10 19:50:53 | 5 | James Miller | $80 | WIN | +$45 | +0.56×Under evens | $14555% of the felt |
| Jul 10 15:43:18 | 3 | Player 3 | $80 | WIN | +$70 | +0.88×Under evens | $20040% of the felt |
| Jul 10 15:41:15 | 6 | Player 6 | $80 | WIN | +$55 | +0.69×Under evens | $18044% of the felt |
| Jul 10 14:58:22 | 5 | James Miller | $80 | WIN | +$40 | +0.50×Under evens | $80100% of the felt |
| Jul 10 13:57:06 | 5 | James Miller | $80 | WIN | +$40 | +0.50×Under evens | $8594% of the felt |
| Jul 10 05:41:33 | 3 | Player 3 | $80 | WIN | +$10 | +0.13×Under evens | $16548% of the felt |
| Jul 10 05:40:37 | 5 | James Miller | $80 | WIN | +$60 | +0.75×Under evens | $27529% of the felt |
| Jul 10 05:15:37 | 7 | Player 7 | $80 | WIN | +$55 | +0.69×Under evens | $1,0608% of the felt |
| Jul 10 04:18:50 | 5 | James Miller | $80 | WIN | +$60 | +0.75×Under evens | $26530% of the felt |
| Jul 9 12:33:26 | 6 | Player 6 | $80 | WIN | +$30 | +0.38×Under evens | $10576% of the felt |
| Jul 9 04:26:23 | 6 | Player 6 | $80 | WIN | +$20 | +0.25×Under evens | $17047% of the felt |
| Jul 9 04:17:14 | 6 | Player 6 | $80 | WIN | +$20 | +0.25×Under evens | $16050% of the felt |
| Jul 9 02:39:33 | 3 | Player 3 | $80 | WIN | +$50 | +0.63×Under evens | $13559% of the felt |
| Jul 9 01:40:29 | 5 | James Miller | $80 | WIN | +$30 | +0.38×Under evens | $13062% of the felt |
| Jul 9 01:08:37 | 7 | Player 7 | $80 | WIN | +$20 | +0.25×Under evens | $53515% of the felt |
| Jul 9 00:15:51 | 7 | Player 7 | $80 | WIN | +$60 | +0.75×Under evens | $71511% of the felt |
| Jul 8 22:27:52 | 3 | Player 3 | $80 | WIN | +$70 | +0.88×Under evens | $21038% of the felt |
| Jul 8 20:37:07 | 8 | Player 8 | $80 | WIN | +$50 | +0.63×Under evens | $19042% of the felt |
| Jul 8 05:56:42 | 5 | James Miller | $80 | WIN | +$20 | +0.25×Under evens | $27030% of the felt |
| Jul 8 05:30:18 | 5 | James Miller | $80 | WIN | +$55 | +0.69×Under evens | $60513% of the felt |
| Jul 8 05:02:49 | 5 | James Miller | $80 | WIN | +$30 | +0.38×Under evens | $36522% of the felt |
| Jul 8 03:16:45 | 3 | Player 3 | $80 | WIN | +$55 | +0.69×Under evens | $16050% of the felt |
| Jul 8 03:04:11 | 6 | Player 6 | $80 | WIN | +$60 | +0.75×Under evens | $25531% of the felt |
| Jul 7 09:23:58 | 7 | Player 7 | $80 | WIN | +$60 | +0.75×Under evens | $80100% of the felt |
| Jul 7 08:16:11 | 6 | Player 6 | $80 | WIN | +$40 | +0.50×Under evens | $8594% of the felt |
| Jul 7 05:16:44 | 8 | Player 8 | $80 | WIN | +$55 | +0.69×Under evens | $9089% of the felt |
| Jul 7 04:57:50 | 8 | Player 8 | $80 | WIN | +$45 | +0.56×Under evens | $14057% of the felt |
| Jul 7 02:57:55 | 5 | James Miller | $80 | WIN | +$70 | +0.88×Under evens | $80100% of the felt |
| Jul 6 23:58:34 | 6 | Player 6 | $80 | WIN | +$40 | +0.50×Under evens | $79010% of the felt |
| Jul 6 23:48:34 | 6 | Player 6 | $80 | WIN | +$55 | +0.69×Under evens | $64512% of the felt |
| Jul 6 23:24:06 | 6 | Player 6 | $80 | WIN | +$40 | +0.50×Under evens | $25531% of the felt |
| Jul 6 23:21:00 | 6 | Player 6 | $80 | WIN | +$30 | +0.38×Under evens | $17047% of the felt |
| Jul 6 21:37:06 | 5 | James Miller | $80 | WIN | +$45 | +0.56×Under evens | $14157% of the felt |
What the bets actually were
1 distinct amount in view — pick one to see only those hands
| Bet | Hands | Share of hands | Staked | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $80 | 112112W 0L 0P | 100.0% | $9.0k | +$4,745 |
How the money came back
Result against the stake. Neither the outcome column nor any total says which of these happened.
| Return | Hands | Share | Staked | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stake lostthe whole bet went | 0 | 0.0% | $0 | $0 |
| Part lostless than the bet came off | 0 | 0.0% | $0 | $0 |
| Pushthe bet came back untouched | 0 | 0.0% | $0 | $0 |
| Under evenswon less than the bet | 112 | 100.0% | $9.0k | +$4,745 |
| Even moneywon exactly the bet | 0 | 0.0% | $0 | $0 |
| Over evenswon more than the bet | 0 | 0.0% | $0 | $0 |
The seven columns
What the export holds, counted over all of it rather than over the slice above.
| Column | What it holds | Distinct values | Range |
|---|---|---|---|
| Time | The deal this hand belongs to. Rows sharing a round_id are one round; the clock has no timezone. | 17,751 rounds | Jul 6 06:58:54 → Jul 31 23:55:16 |
| Player | Who was in the seat. The export names nobody — a profile can be linked to a seat on the players page. | 7 players | Player 1, Player 2, Player 3, Player 5, Player 6, Player 7, Player 8 |
| Seat | Where they sat. In this export the seat number and the player number are always the same. | 7 seats | seats 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8 |
| Bet | What went out before the hand was played. Summed across a round it equals total table action exactly. | 260 amounts | $1 → $3,075 · $52 average |
| Win/Loss | The label on the hand. It never disagrees with the sign of the result, so it adds nothing the money does not. | 3 values | 12,555 WIN · 22,322 LOSS · 7,328 PUSH |
| Result | The seat's own position on the hand, signed: negative is the player down, positive up, zero a push. Not the room's collection — that fee has no column in this export. | 429 amounts | −$2,800 → $16,400 |
| Total Table Action | The whole table's stake for that deal, repeated on every hand of the round. | 528 amounts | $1 → $5,370 · $172 average |
42,205 rows in the export, nothing dropped and nothing added. Every other page on this dashboard is one of these tables summed.